Description
|
Exploration of small Solar System bodies has traditionally been performed by single monolithic spacecraft carrying a number of science instruments. However, science instruments typically cannot be operated simultaneously due to the instrument requirements including optimal viewing angle, surface illumination, altitude and ground resolution, power, and data constraints. This observation has motivated interest in multi-spacecraft architectures where a swarm of small spacecraft, each carrying a single science instrument, studies a small body after being deployed by a carrier spacecraft, which then collects data from the vehicles and relays it to Earth. Such architectures hold promise to yield significant improvements in mission efficiency, increases in data quality, and shorter mission duration. A key difficulty in the design of such missions is the selection of orbits for the small spacecraft, which must satisfy not only instrument requirements, but also strict inter-spacecraft communication and on-board storage constraints. To address this, in this paper, we present a novel computationally-efficient optimization algorithm for \emph{communication-aware design} of the orbits of a small spacecraft swarm orbiting a small body. The proposed approach captures constraints including instrument requirements, inter-spacecraft communication bandwidths, and on-board memory usage, and it can accommodate highly irregular gravity field models and surface geometries. We propose an efficient algorithm for optimization of instrument observations and inter-spacecraft communications; we then leverage the differentiable nature of the proposed algorithm to accelerate a gradient-based global search algorithm. Numerical simulations of a six-spacecraft swarm studying 433 Eros show that the proposed approach successfully identifies high-quality orbits, and significantly outperform communication-agnostic optimization techniques, resulting in a 10% increase in scientific returns and a 30% increase in the quality of the collected data.
|