dc.contributor.author |
Stoller, Scott D. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bartocci, Ezio |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Seyster, Justin |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Grosu, Radu |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Havelund, Klaus |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Smolka, Scott A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zadok, Erez |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-09-09T15:00:47Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-09-09T15:00:47Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-09-26 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2nd International Conference on Runtime Verification, San Francisco, California, September 27 - 30, 2011 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.clearanceno |
11-4131 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2014/43652 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We introduce the concept of Runtime Verification with State Estimation and show how this concept can be applied to estimate the
probability that a temporal property is satisfied by a run of a program when monitoring overhead is reduced by sampling. In such situations, there may be gaps in the observed program executions, thus making accurate estimation challenging. To deal with the effects of sampling on runtime verification, we view event sequences as observation sequences of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM), use an HMM model of the monitored program to “fill in” sampling-induced gaps in observation sequences, and extend the classic forward algorithm for HMM state estimation (which determines the probability of a state sequence, given an observation sequence) to compute the probability that the property is satisfied by an execution of the program. To validate our approach, we present a case study based on the mission software for a Mars rover. The results of our case study demonstrate high prediction accuracy for the probabilities computed by our algorithm. They also show that our technique is much more accurate than simply evaluating the temporal property on the given observation sequences, ignoring the gaps. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
NASA/JPL |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Pasadena, CA : Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2011. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
runtime verification |
en_US |
dc.subject |
sampling |
en_US |
dc.subject |
temporal logic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
makov models |
en_US |
dc.title |
Runtime verification with state estimation |
en_US |
dc.type |
Preprint |
en_US |