Abstract:
The return of science is the fundamental objective of any planetary mission. However, which constellation of science observations constitute the best return of science is hard to evaluate. Past approaches toward planning science observations have been based on co-location of payload scientists who debate the merits of which investigation had the stronger science. This advocacy approach is time-consuming and does not provide appropriate incentives for science teams to reveal their trade-offs. An alternative approach, currently under evaluation by the Cassini Mission to Saturn, is one based on providing better incentives to the science teams. Incentives can produce better tradeoffs because the individuals who can make the best decisions about which science observations to propose, what resources are required to implement the observations, and which observations are most important are the science team's Principle Investigators (PI) themselves.
